Even when i sincerely aspire to outgrow my prejudices, opinions, and preferences “consciously” and I am sincere in consecration too. But later after the results – on analysis I find that all that are “unconsciously” organised around one of my nature which makes those limitations in result.

To understand it as principle I said:  We consecrate only till our nature permits albeit unconsciously. Or inversely our consecration is limited to our nature.

How I reach that conclusion. I have a sense mind (manasu) and pure mind (Buddhi). First, I take out all the experiences, feelings related to that and see what the essence of all these is and why got that. With that summary of essences, I go to pure mind which gives logic behind those essences. That gives me the foundation I made for those acts.

In Singapore incident which I often explain in Life Divine speeches , as we had visa for only seven days and already three days for a consultant, I was reluctant to wait for more.  One of my nature self-reliance. So, I said I can do it on my own. I just took a yellow page and had a rapid opening which gave me an idea on emerging industrial hub in Singapore which even my Singapore partner was unaware. That lead to opening office in Singapore with all registrations in three days that too during weekend holidays.

My questions are whether we can do it before hand than analysing after math.  Can we call this as insight or intuition? I am not bringing here any of spiritual terms of yogic intuition or awareness of the psychic etc.,

Just trying to build on one of the Sri Karmayogi’s explanations on Ramanuja or Sherlock homes- insight or intuition – that comes from: Discrimination-Inspiration-Revelation.